From the Editor’s Eye
The 10 Most Common Errors Made by Writers
(And How to Fix Them)
The first of a ten-part series.
#10. They’re, Their Now: Contractions & Homophonic Convergence
Our ears (and eyes) play dirty tricks on us when it comes to contractions and the words that sound like them. The process can cause us great anxiety as we think back to our eighth-grade English class and try to recall the rules Ms. Bitterlip laid out for us.
I encounter these examples most often:
- They’re, Their, There, There’re
- they’re = a contraction of they are:
They’re going to the concert. - their = a pronoun relating to two or more people, especially in the sense of possession, ownership, or belonging to them:
That is their house. - there = a place: He is standing over there.
or a point in a process: There is where I disagree with you. - there’re = a contraction of there are:
There’re four items in the shopping cart.
- they’re = a contraction of they are:
- You’re, Your, Yore
- you’re = a contraction of you are:
You’re going where? - your = a pronoun relating to you or belonging to you:
Is that your house? - yore = a time long past:
Once upon a time, in the days of yore . . .
- you’re = a contraction of you are:
- It’s vs. Its
- it’s = a contraction of it is:
It’s your turn. - its = a pronoun relating to an object, especially in the sense of possession or belonging to, or of an action:
The legislature passed the law, its final enactment of the session.
- it’s = a contraction of it is:
- Could’ve, Should’ve
- Could’ve is the contracted form of “could have”: She could have gone home.
- Should’ve is the contracted form of “should have”: She should have gone home.
- incorrect: She could of gone home.
- incorrect: She should of gone home.
- correct: She could’ve gone home.
- correct: She should’ve gone home.
- Let’s vs. Lets
- let’s = a contraction of let us
Let’s go for a walk. - lets = third-person singular form of the verb let: to permit or allow
Having a dog lets me sleep soundly at night.
- let’s = a contraction of let us
- Here’s and There’s
- here’s = a contraction of here is; it refers to a single item or instance
- there’s = a contraction of there is; it refers to a single item or instance
I probably hear these contractions more often than I see them in print, but it bugs me nonetheless: singular construction used in a plural context, even by otherwise apparently literate individuals and those who make a living speaking to the public.
- incorrect: Here’s three reasons for that.
- incorrect: There’s three reasons for that.
- correct: Here are three reasons for that. Or, when speaking (not recommended for written form, unless in dialogue): Here’re three reasons for that.
- correct: There are three reasons for that. Or, when speaking (not recommended for written form, unless in dialogue): There’re three reasons for that.
If you have examples or anecdotes you want to share with me and others, please use the comment box at the bottom of the page.
References & Resources
- The Associated Press Stylebook
- The Chicago Manual of Style
- The Elements of Style
- Grammar Girl
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary
- Resources for Writers, Editors, and Indie Publishers
Rewind:
Still to come:
#9. Commagain? The Oxford Deflate & Dialogue Punchuating Bag
#8. Word Contortion: Homophonic Trip-ups
#7. Three Dots and Out: Give Your Ellipsis Elbow Room
#6. A Tense Moment: Word Context, Past& Present
#5. Dash It All! Part A: Hyphen and En Dash
#4. Dash It All! Part B: Em Dash
#3. Pronounflagration: Pronoun Profusion, Confusion, Contusion
#2. Apostrophic Calamity: Apostrophe vs. Dumb Quotes
#1. Verbal Abuse: Lie Down with Lay & Related Verb Warps
Extra: My Pet Peeves
Pingback: From the Editor’s Eye: The 10 Most Common Errors Made by Writers | Polishing Your Prose
When I was teaching, I saw these contractions errors so many times that I had to double check my own use of them.
Yikes! This is one of those times when I wish I could edit my reply after submitting it. I didn’t need to make “contraction” plural. I was ruined by seeing so many usage, punctuation, and other language errors during a 40-year teaching career.
Flora, I know what you mean. Many times I find that I second guess myself, too, because I see the errors so often.
Love your (not you’re . .. ahem) graphic. Reminds me of. “Let’s eat, Gramma.” Much more social acceptable WITH the comma.
Yes, let’s NOT eat grandma.
Reblogged this on Sandra Yeaman and commented:
And here’s #10 in Larry’s David Letterman Top Ten format: Contractions & Homonymic Convergence. I like big words; don’t you?
Thank you!
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #10 | San Diego Writers/Editors Guild
It is much more civilized for us to analyze words to see why contractions are spelled as they are than it is to swear and scream and tear books and punch out people who say “could of” or who refuse to use “I” as a subject and “me” as an object. Well done!
I agree. I will address the use of pronouns in #3.
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #7 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #6 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #5 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #4 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #3 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #2 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #1 | Polishing Your Prose
Pingback: Ten Most Common Errors Made by Writers: #0 | Polishing Your Prose